And Jackets, too! May as well admit that sartorial faux pas right up front. In a previous post, on overcoats, the term “jacket” somehow snuck in. How? I’ve no idea. Sometimes posts get written and edited at 11:00 pm or later, when my hands continue to type long after I’ve fallen into sweet slumber. Anyway, an alert and knowledgeable gent brought this to my attention—not the part about me sleeping and typing at the same time, I mean the other thing, using the term “jacket” to describe—yes—an overcoat. He’s right of course—a jacket goes to the hips or waist, and an overcoat goes far beyond that, unless you’re 12 feet tall and they don’t make jackets in your size, in which case a jacket and an overcoat become one in the same. But no, let us not blur the lines of precise sartorial terminology with hypothetical what’s-its.
Rather, consider this—and I think I must have mentioned this before, at least in passing, but last night’s trip to a fairly decent restaurant brought it to my mind again; it was hardly possible for it not to come to mind again, because it’s maddening, astounding, and laughable all at the same instant—there sits a beautiful woman, dressed beautifully besides, and across from him sits some guy wearing a t-shirt, and if she is particularly lucky, he is wearing pants of some sort rather than shorts. His whole demeanor is that of a child out to dinner with his mum (or in
Perhaps, however, these fellows are all severely vision impaired, I don't know. Or maybe they want to dress like men did circa 800 AD, when baths were far and few between, they had just come in from fields at 9 in the eve, and being exhausted with honest toil hadn't the energy to put on the tails and topper. Granted, they dressed a bit different back in 800 or so AD; their t-shirts sported pictures of Charlemagne rather than their favorite baseball team. But I'm sure you understand what I'm saying--these modern guys have no reason to dress like slobs.
To make matters worse, some times these lads even refuse to take their (usually baseball) hats off at the table! Now, if anyone has a right to keep his hat on at the table, it would be me--these guys almost always have dashing heads of hair under those hats, whereas I now have a dashing head. And no one will find me wearing a hat at the table.
I'm afraid I've no solution to the problem either. Maybe--just maybe--if on the way out of the restaurant we walk by those tables, and, looking at the beautiful lady, say something like, "You have a very well-behaved son," or "Your friend here looks like an ass," things will change. It may of course not be the change you want--it could well be the badly dressed bloke will change your face for the worse. Maybe, though, a discreet sympathetic look towards the lady would do the trick.
And now, I must take off the old overcoat jacket thing, put on the pajamas and head to bed before my hands start typing about baseball Fedoras...







2 comments:
Once again you hit the well known nail on the head with your observations and comments. Would you believe I'm the only man in my department who comes to work wearing shiny shoes, clean pants, a dress shirt and a blazer or sport coat? On rainy days I willingly share my umbrella with students who are on the verge of being soaked. One of the many things I learned in Alumni College is the importance of being a good role model.
Keep up the great writing!
Johnny Ham
I think this is a good discussion, it just does apply to Texas or Texans. I see no problem with wearing a baseball cap or a cowboy hat at the table. It often adds a wonderfully appealing dimension to ones dress. Around her we hear things like "really nice cap" or "that cowboy hat suits you well". Often in restaurants ladies, I mean really nice looking and well mannered ladies, are heard saying, "darn that guys looks great with that cowboy hat". Etc. Etc. Etc. So I guess your discussion must apply to another county, or planet. I always suspected a problem with people other than Texans. I mean, really, good gosh, what in the world is different about a nice pair of shoes or a nice cap or hat. So, look, if one finds it inappropriate to wear a hat or cap or even a wig at the table, then is follows that it is inappropriate to wear shoes at the table. They are typically much dirtier, no matter how well shined. I'll go with being real rather than go with falsity of the shine on the shoe.
Post a Comment